I know I've said it before, but it's just amazing what a little money ($18 million/year) can do for a person's look. She really does look great in these pics! A far cry from her too tight, high waisted jeans with tucked in long-sleeved tee and bad highlights.
Everyone go eat a big birthday sammie in honor of Rachael today.
**********************************
See? I can be nice! =)
[Images Source]
You're right! Money can make one pretty. She looks way better today than when she first started. I still can't stand her voice though!
ReplyDeletei have to admit she does look better than when she first started, but did she get another new hairstyle? her hair in the pic to the right looks lighter than the one to the left...lighting or highlighting?
ReplyDeleteThose pix are photoshopped! She's a little chubbier than that in-person. And it's not HER money that's making prettier, it's her public relations' machine's money. (Boy, are you guys naive.)
ReplyDeleteGotta agree with third anonymous.
ReplyDeleteYeah she looks good, but her face doesn't move either. lol
ReplyDeleteUmmm-she wouldn't have money if not for her PR machine. Of course we all know that. We're not naive-you're a jerk!
ReplyDeleteShe STILL looks like Jack Nicholson as the Joker...
ReplyDeleteIt is HER money. It's her brand and it's her money. But then again who cares. She gets to spend it. You go girl. Love the new house. Both of them.
ReplyDeleteYeah she could be annoying but she is cute.
ReplyDelete18 million dollars buys a lot of photoshopping software.
ReplyDeleteMaybe now that Rachael is 40 years old, she'll start talking like an adult and ditch the sammie. I can only hope.
ReplyDeleteHappy Birthday Rach
ReplyDeleteI don't watch her. Can't stand her,
her kitch, and close-ups of her giant man hands.
But live long and prosper
I wonder who gives the better pickle wash ? Rachel or Giada ?
ReplyDeleteBoth of them could concoct one helluva embouchure with their large mouths. Yikes Batman! It's the Jokers.
moo
ReplyDeleteThese pictures are so AIR-BRUSHED. Have you seen her on her new Foodnetwork Shows. She has gained so much weight and that hair do (what is it) no style. Just AWFUL. Sorry but who ever is her stylest needs to go back to Fashion and Hair school.
ReplyDeleteMan...you guys.
ReplyDeleteFor the few of you out there that don't like Rachael, whatever!
Hundreds of people do, $ 18 million/year worth.
Looking good Rachael.
Happy Birthday!!!!
Rach you know you look good! Happy 40th Birthday!!! I wonder if you had one heck of a party?! Don't mind these haters talking smack about you gaining weight they probably big as a house hiding behind this blog. And to patty o....18 million worth of photoshoppe software couldn't make you look as good as Paula Dean when she wakes up in the morning so wtf you talking about? What magazine cover or photo out there ISN'T cropped? You just mad. You do your thing Rach I can't get enough of ya!
ReplyDeleteCharles , living vicariously thru the lives of out of reach, out of touch FN figures. freak.
ReplyDeleteit could be the photoshopping rather than the money!
ReplyDeleteWow, I don't think I've ever seen multiple pictures of Rachael where no cleavage is visible! I'm sorry, but that outfit she wore at South Beach was borderline obscene. Maybe now that she's passed the big 4 0, she'll cool it with the plunging necklines.
ReplyDeleteCall it as you see it, anon @ 10:35am, but I enjoy her show and thanks to her I actually USE my kitchen and found that I do like to cook. It relaxes me and I always like the end product. Your mis-informed btw by saying that she's "out of touch". $18 million doesn't come from having no viewership or fans. Dumbf**k.
ReplyDeleteFor how long were the only stylists working on her show food stylists - or drunk and blind (maybe working w/ aunt sandy's cocktail time a bit much). Rach was horrible then and not much better now. I hope the no talent hack (and proud of it) collapses face down in her GB and leaves us all for good.
ReplyDeleteFirst, let me say I am a Rachael fan and I'm a graphic designer. Not only are those pics photoshopped, they are BADLY photoshopped. I would bet money that the faces and bodies are from two entirely different shoots.
ReplyDeleteThis is NOT Rachael's fault. Speaking from my experience in the biz, most likely, she's too busy for photo shoots so her PR people used what they had.
Airbrush? OF COURSE they are (digitally) air brushed, you twit. No professional publication uses "untouched" pics. All professional press pics are manipulated in some way, but these are dangerously close to crossing an ethical standard - they obviously are distorting her appearance instead of enhancing it. Just my two cents...
Also, (ahem) you folks do know there is an election going on, right? Genocide in Darfur? War in Iraq? OK, self important speech over. Peace...
Thank you Jason for your post. Like I stated in an earlier post, what publicity picture out there isn't airbrushed? These haters just find something on her and run with it when they need to sit their a** down somewhere and stfu already.
ReplyDeleteRachael Rocks and she is so Totally BEAUTIFUL !
ReplyDelete